Structured intake
Field mapping for invoice number, supplier, dates, amounts, and the document source.
Move from an inbox attachment to a checked, structured invoice record without losing the source or bypassing finance.

Rekeying supplier details is only part of the work. Your team also has to find the purchase order, spot duplicates, and explain mismatches. A workflow should prepare those checks together rather than turn an uncertain document into an unquestioned record.

Start with a redacted normal invoice, a mismatch, and the record your team wants at the end.
A supplier invoice arrives through an agreed intake channel.
Compare extracted fields with the supplier record, purchase order, and duplicate rules.
Prepare a draft invoice record with source references and mismatch notes.
Finance resolves exceptions and authorizes the next step; no payment is released by this example.
Which intake channel is the source of truth for a new invoice: a mailbox, a portal, or a scanning queue?
Which records must exist before matching starts: the supplier master, the purchase order, or both?
Who owns the exception queue when a match is uncertain, and how quickly do they need to see it?
Field mapping for invoice number, supplier, dates, amounts, and the document source.
Visible missing fields, suspected duplicates, and purchase-order differences with a resolution owner.
A reviewed export or draft integration, rerun rules, and a record of what was approved.
Agree the trigger, source systems, reviewer, and acceptance criteria. Build the bounded preparation path, then test it with the person who will own it.
Test an unreadable invoice, a duplicate submission, and a supplier name that does not match the master record.
Bank-detail changes, tax treatment, posting, and payment authorization are not inferred from an attachment. Those decisions follow your agreed controls.
See how acceptance evidence works ↗Follow a duplicate-invoice check from extracted fields to a review decision. The synthetic inputs, comparison rules, results, and runnable example are all available.
Coverage depends on the documents tested. Unreadable or unfamiliar formats should be routed for review, not silently accepted.
Not by default. Payment release is a separate, explicitly authorized scope and should preserve finance approvals.