Agents Autonomous
Finance / Invoice processing

Invoices, ready for a real review.

Move from an inbox attachment to a checked, structured invoice record without losing the source or bypassing finance.

Book a call ↗Free 30-minute call. Bring one task.
An inbox attachment unfolds into a structured invoice card with supplier, amount and reference rows shown only as empty geometric fields; purchase-order evidence stays attached and a duplicate-looking sheet is retained for finance review.
Where it gets stuck

Invoice processing,
with the context attached.

Rekeying supplier details is only part of the work. Your team also has to find the purchase order, spot duplicates, and explain mismatches. A workflow should prepare those checks together rather than turn an uncertain document into an unquestioned record.

Two invoice sheets overlap under a comparison lens beside a purchase order; a mismatching line and duplicate reference are marked with separate tabs, while the proposed record remains unfinished. Check rekeying and evidence together.
A good first scope

Start with a redacted normal invoice, a mismatch, and the record your team wants at the end.

The workflow
  1. 01 / The starting point

    A supplier invoice arrives through an agreed intake channel.

  2. 02 / The right context

    Compare extracted fields with the supplier record, purchase order, and duplicate rules.

  3. 03 / Prepared for review

    Prepare a draft invoice record with source references and mismatch notes.

  4. 04 / A person decides

    Finance resolves exceptions and authorizes the next step; no payment is released by this example.

Before we start

Three things
to settle first.

  1. Which intake channel is the source of truth for a new invoice: a mailbox, a portal, or a scanning queue?

  2. Which records must exist before matching starts: the supplier master, the purchase order, or both?

  3. Who owns the exception queue when a match is uncertain, and how quickly do they need to see it?

Tangible work

A useful working handoff

01

Structured intake

Field mapping for invoice number, supplier, dates, amounts, and the document source.

02

An exception queue

Visible missing fields, suspected duplicates, and purchase-order differences with a resolution owner.

03

A safe handoff

A reviewed export or draft integration, rerun rules, and a record of what was approved.

How we would start

Map it. Test it.
Then decide.

Agree the trigger, source systems, reviewer, and acceptance criteria. Build the bounded preparation path, then test it with the person who will own it.

Include the awkward cases

Test an unreadable invoice, a duplicate submission, and a supplier name that does not match the master record.

Keep this boundary explicit

Bank-detail changes, tax treatment, posting, and payment authorization are not inferred from an attachment. Those decisions follow your agreed controls.

See how acceptance evidence works ↗

Inspect a working example.

Follow a duplicate-invoice check from extracted fields to a review decision. The synthetic inputs, comparison rules, results, and runnable example are all available.

Read the worked example ↗
A few useful answers

Before we begin.

Can it handle every invoice format?

Coverage depends on the documents tested. Unreadable or unfamiliar formats should be routed for review, not silently accepted.

Does it pay suppliers?

Not by default. Payment release is a separate, explicitly authorized scope and should preserve finance approvals.

A useful conversation starts here

Where does the work
get stuck?

Start with a redacted normal invoice, a mismatch, and the record your team wants at the end.

Book a call ↗