A source-linked RFI draft
The field question beside controlled drawing references and relevant prior responses.
AI for Construction
Keep the question clear. Keep the project context.
Help project teams prepare traceable RFIs, organize revision-sensitive records, and bring commercial changes to the right reviewer.
RFI workspace
A useful handoff
A field question with its context.
| Reference | Check | Next step |
|---|---|---|
| Marked-up drawing | Superseded issue | Confirm current reference |
| Related RFI | Similar question found | Check response context |
| Field location | Detail not identified | Coordinator to clarify |
Keep the question, document status, and missing detail together.
Built around your work
The work behind the industryWhere the day
Where the day
gets held up.
The field, design team, subcontractor, and commercial owner often work from different document snapshots. A useful coordination layer keeps project identity and decision authority attached to the question instead of inventing a confident technical answer.
Sound familiar?
Project coordinators spend time finding the drawing revision behind each field question.
Related RFIs and confirmed responses are difficult to trace across document updates.
Commercial reviewers need changed wording and supporting records collected before a decision.
Practical places to put AI to workStart with a task
Start with a task
your team recognizes.
Open a workflow to see its inputs, prepared output, and review point.
Workflow 01
Prepare a traceable RFI
Bring the field question, controlled drawing references, and related responses into a coordinator's draft.
See the inputs, work & handoff Workflow 02Organize commercial document changes
Compare versions and source passages against the review checklist maintained by the commercial or legal team.
See the inputs, work & handoff Workflow 03Keep coordination actions clear
Turn approved meeting notes into sourced actions, open questions, and dates the meeting owner can confirm.
See the inputs, work & handoffA useful first projectOne workflow.
One workflow.
A concrete handoff.
Choose one project and discipline. Agree source status, participant access, RFI routing, and the authorized design and commercial reviewers.
Scope a first projectProject outline01
Prepare RFIs for one project discipline
Bring these inputs
- Field question and markup
- Controlled drawing register
- Existing RFI and response log
- The prepared output
- A coordinator-ready RFI draft with source references, potential duplicates, and unresolved questions.
- The person who reviews it
- RFI coordinator, with the designated design authority responsible for the technical response.
- What we would test
- Use matching sheet numbers from separate projects and a superseded response. The draft must retain the correct project and issue status and surface any missing reference.
Tangible work
What the team takes away.
A commercial review pack
Changed scope wording and supporting records prepared for the commercial owner, not automatic entitlement claims.
A project handover register
Confirmed decisions, open questions, and record ownership kept distinct during team changes.
Built for the settingThe details
The details
that shape the scope.
Project separation is mandatory
Similar sheet numbers, subcontractor names, and room references occur on unrelated jobs. Search and drafts must remain within approved project access.
Issue status is not just a date
Tender, construction, superseded, and approved-for-specific-use documents have different roles. The document register must determine what can be relied on.
A response can change obligations
An RFI answer is not automatically a change order or notice to proceed. Design, commercial, and field authorities need separate decision records.
Test the awkward cases.
Test two projects with the same sheet number, a superseded bulletin, a missing referenced detail, and a response that needs a separate commercial review.
The help behind the workflowChoose the work.
Choose the work.
Then the right service.
010203
Explore all services ↗Custom AI software
Build an RFI preparation view around project identity, issue status, source drawings, and routing.
Document intelligence
Prepare passage-linked comparisons and organize revision-sensitive records for authorized reviewers.
Process automation
Connect confirmed coordination actions, responsible people, and unresolved project handoffs.
A few useful answers
Before we begin.
Which project is a useful place to start?
Choose a project with an active RFI coordinator and a maintained document register. Limit the first workflow to one discipline so the correct drawing status and response authority can be checked together.
Can the workflow use our existing project records?
Yes, the existing document register and RFI log are the starting sources to assess. Confirm their export or integration options and preserve project identity, revision, and issue status through the handoff.
Can it recommend how to build a detail?
No. Technical design interpretation and construction instructions require the responsible professionals and the project’s approved procedures.
Does it decide whether a change is payable?
No. It can assemble the relevant records. Entitlement, notice requirements, and commercial acceptance are decisions for authorized reviewers and counsel where needed.